| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <341cc328-1454-44b1-bd58-93fa18bc72de@davidwei.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:01:49 -0800
From: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] s390/iucv: MSG_PEEK causes memory leak in
iucv_sock_destruct()
On 2024-11-19 07:22, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> From: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Passing MSG_PEEK flag to skb_recv_datagram() increments skb refcount
> (skb->users) and iucv_sock_recvmsg() does not decrement skb refcount
> at exit.
> This results in skb memory leak in skb_queue_purge() and WARN_ON in
> iucv_sock_destruct() during socket close. To fix this decrease
> skb refcount by one if MSG_PEEK is set in order to prevent memory
> leak and WARN_ON.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6292 at net/iucv/af_iucv.c:286 iucv_sock_destruct+0x144/0x1a0 [af_iucv]
> CPU: 2 PID: 6292 Comm: afiucv_test_msg Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc7 #1
> Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (z/VM 7.3.0)
> Call Trace:
> [<001587c682c4aa98>] iucv_sock_destruct+0x148/0x1a0 [af_iucv]
> [<001587c682c4a9d0>] iucv_sock_destruct+0x80/0x1a0 [af_iucv]
> [<001587c704117a32>] __sk_destruct+0x52/0x550
> [<001587c704104a54>] __sock_release+0xa4/0x230
> [<001587c704104c0c>] sock_close+0x2c/0x40
> [<001587c702c5f5a8>] __fput+0x2e8/0x970
> [<001587c7024148c4>] task_work_run+0x1c4/0x2c0
> [<001587c7023b0716>] do_exit+0x996/0x1050
> [<001587c7023b13aa>] do_group_exit+0x13a/0x360
> [<001587c7023b1626>] __s390x_sys_exit_group+0x56/0x60
> [<001587c7022bccca>] do_syscall+0x27a/0x380
> [<001587c7049a6a0c>] __do_syscall+0x9c/0x160
> [<001587c7049ce8a8>] system_call+0x70/0x98
> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> [<001587c682c4a9d4>] iucv_sock_destruct+0x84/0x1a0 [af_iucv]
>
> Fixes: eac3731bd04c ("[S390]: Add AF_IUCV socket support")
> Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> The following mailaddresses are no longer active:
> Frank Pavlic <fpavlic@...ibm.com> (blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> (blamed_fixes:1/1=100%)
> ---
> net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> index c00323fa9eb6..7929df08d4e0 100644
> --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
> @@ -1236,7 +1236,9 @@ static int iucv_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> /* receive/dequeue next skb:
> - * the function understands MSG_PEEK and, thus, does not dequeue skb */
> + * the function understands MSG_PEEK and, thus, does not dequeue skb
> + * only refcount is increased.
> + */
> skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err);
I checked the call graph and `flags` is passed through:
skb_recv_datagram()
-> __skb_recv_datagram()
-> __skb_try_recv_datagram()
-> __skb_try_recv_from_queue()
If MSG_PEEK is set and a valid skb is returned then skb->users is
incremented.
> if (!skb) {
> if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
> @@ -1252,9 +1254,8 @@ static int iucv_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> cskb = skb;
> if (skb_copy_datagram_msg(cskb, offset, msg, copied)) {
> - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK))
> - skb_queue_head(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> - return -EFAULT;
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + goto err_out;
Previous behaviour is unchanged. Now if MSG_PEEK is set then skb->users
is decremented. At this point skb is guaranteed to be valid.
> }
>
> /* SOCK_SEQPACKET: set MSG_TRUNC if recv buf size is too small */
> @@ -1271,11 +1272,8 @@ static int iucv_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> err = put_cmsg(msg, SOL_IUCV, SCM_IUCV_TRGCLS,
> sizeof(IUCV_SKB_CB(skb)->class),
> (void *)&IUCV_SKB_CB(skb)->class);
> - if (err) {
> - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK))
> - skb_queue_head(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> - return err;
> - }
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out;
Same as above.
>
> /* Mark read part of skb as used */
> if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
> @@ -1331,8 +1329,18 @@ static int iucv_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> /* SOCK_SEQPACKET: return real length if MSG_TRUNC is set */
> if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET && (flags & MSG_TRUNC))
> copied = rlen;
> + if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
> + skb_unref(skb);
I checked that all return paths with MSG_PEEK and a valid skb result in
skb_unref().
The remaining return paths either have !MSG_PEEK or !skb:
(1)
if (!skb) {
if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
return 0;
return err;
}
(2)
if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
...
if (iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_HIPER) {
atomic_inc(&iucv->msg_recv);
if (atomic_read(&iucv->msg_recv) > iucv->msglimit) {
WARN_ON(1);
iucv_sock_close(sk);
return -EFAULT;
}
}
...
}
>
> return copied;
> +
> +err_out:
> + if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK))
> + skb_queue_head(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> + else
> + skb_unref(skb);
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static inline __poll_t iucv_accept_poll(struct sock *parent)
Reviewed-by: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists