[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5011ae11bd9b48c5bf8e1bf400aa5d13@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 07:23:12 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
CC: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
Ping-Ke Shih
<pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 2/4] rtase: Correct the speed for RTL907XD-V1
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:08:26PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> > Correct the speed for RTL907XD-V1.
> >
>
> Please add more details about the problem the patch is fixing.
Ok, I will make the necessary changes to the commit message.
>
> > Fixes: dd7f17c40fd1 ("rtase: Implement ethtool function")
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> > index 0c19c5645d53..5b8012987ea6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> > @@ -1714,10 +1714,21 @@ static int rtase_get_settings(struct net_device
> *dev,
> > struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd) {
> > u32 supported = SUPPORTED_MII | SUPPORTED_Pause |
> > SUPPORTED_Asym_Pause;
> > + const struct rtase_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> >
> >
> ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(cmd->link_modes.supported,
> > supported);
> > - cmd->base.speed = SPEED_5000;
> > +
> > + switch (tp->hw_ver) {
> > + case 0x00800000:
> > + case 0x04000000:
> > + cmd->base.speed = SPEED_5000;
> > + break;
> > + case 0x04800000:
> > + cmd->base.speed = SPEED_10000;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Above you are adding the code introducing some magic numbers and in your
> last patch you are refactoring that newly added code.
> Would it be possible to avoid those intermediate results and prepare the final
> version of the fix in the series?
We would still prefer to follow the "single patch, single purpose"
approach for this part. Other reviewers have also provided similar
feedback, so we would like to maintain the current approach.
>
> > cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
> > cmd->base.port = PORT_MII;
> > cmd->base.autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists