[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fc55df5a3e84743a93a16f4a8807dfe@realtek.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 06:40:06 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
CC: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
Ping-Ke Shih
<pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3 4/4] rtase: Add defines for hardware version id
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:22:46AM +0000, Justin Lai wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:08:28PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> > > > Add defines for hardware version id.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h | 5 ++++-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 12 ++++++------
> > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > The patch is addressed to the "net" tree, but "Fixes" tag is missing.
> > > Also, the patch does not look like a bugfix it's rather an
> > > improvement of coding style with no functional changes. That's why I doubt
> it should go to the "net"
> > > tree.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michal
> >
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > This patch introduces multiple defines for hardware version IDs,
> > rather than addressing any issues related to the function logic, which
> > is why it does not include a "Fixes:" tag. The reason for isolating
> > this change in a separate patch is to maintain a "single patch, single
> purpose" approach.
> > Additionally, these defines will be used in other patches within the
> > same patch set, which is why they are included in this patch set as a whole.
> >
> > Justin
> >
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> I understand the purpose of the patch, however the patch is addressed to the
> "net" tree. Each patch sent to "net" tree should have "Fixes" tag, because that
> tree is for fixes only.
> You may consider sending the patch to the "net-next", (which is closed now
> because of the merge window).
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
Hi Michal,
Thank you for your suggestion. Upon further consideration, I agree
that the addition of the hardware version ID definitions should have been
implemented directly when fixing the related issue. I will make the
necessary changes accordingly.
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists