[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d487b58-6850-499c-a131-b8169061759a@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:09:24 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Feng Wang <wangfe@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, antony.antony@...unet.com, leonro@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: add SA information to the offloaded packet when
if_id is set
Hi,
On 11/19/24 23:04, Feng Wang wrote:
> From: wangfe <wangfe@...gle.com>
Unneeded, since the author (you) matches the submitter email address
(yours).
BTW please include a patch revision number into the subj prefix to help
reviewers.
> @@ -240,6 +256,7 @@ bool nsim_ipsec_tx(struct netdevsim *ns, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct xfrm_state *xs;
> struct nsim_sa *tsa;
> u32 sa_idx;
> + struct xfrm_offload *xo;
This is network driver code, please respect the reverse x-mas tree order
above.
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> index e5722c95b8bb..59ac45f0c4ac 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,8 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct xfrm_state *x = skb_dst(skb)->xfrm;
> int family;
> int err;
> + struct xfrm_offload *xo;
> + struct sec_path *sp;
I see the xfrm subtree is more relaxed with the reverse x-mas tree
order, but for consistency I would respect it even here.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists