[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241121-feature_poe_port_prio-v3-3-83299fa6967c@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:42:29 +0100
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>,
Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 03/27] net: pse-pd: Avoid setting max_uA in
regulator constraints
From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Setting the max_uA constraint in the regulator API imposes a current
limit during the regulator registration process. This behavior conflicts
with preserving the maximum PI power budget configuration across reboots.
Instead, compare the desired current limit to MAX_PI_CURRENT in the
pse_pi_set_current_limit() function to ensure proper handling of the
power budget.
Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
---
Change ni v3:
- New patch
---
drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
index 2906ce173f66..9fee4dd53515 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
@@ -357,6 +357,9 @@ static int pse_pi_set_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uA,
if (!ops->pi_set_current_limit)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (max_uA > MAX_PI_CURRENT)
+ return -ERANGE;
+
id = rdev_get_id(rdev);
mutex_lock(&pcdev->lock);
ret = ops->pi_set_current_limit(pcdev, id, max_uA);
@@ -403,11 +406,9 @@ devm_pse_pi_regulator_register(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
rinit_data->constraints.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS;
- if (pcdev->ops->pi_set_current_limit) {
+ if (pcdev->ops->pi_set_current_limit)
rinit_data->constraints.valid_ops_mask |=
REGULATOR_CHANGE_CURRENT;
- rinit_data->constraints.max_uA = MAX_PI_CURRENT;
- }
rinit_data->supply_regulator = "vpwr";
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists