netdev - Re: [PATCH] nfc: s3fwrn5: Prefer strscpy() over strcpy()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ad018d8-a2a2-4bf3-86d0-47bbe2c3d94d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:22:37 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@...ahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: s3fwrn5: Prefer strscpy() over strcpy()

On 26/11/2024 09:49, Abdul Rahim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 07:38:43AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/11/2024 21:41, Abdul Rahim wrote:
>>> Do i need to resend it. What additional information do I need to
>>> provide?
>>
>>
>> You cut entire email, no clue what's this.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Do I need to resend this patch [1]. You gave it `Reviewed-by` tag. But
> it's not applied yet.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241029221641.15726-1-abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com/
First, it is merge window, no point to ping during that time. It is
actually highly discouraged, unless this is a fix. And it is not a fix.

Second, this should have net-next PATCH prefix, see subsystem profile
for networking.

I asked to change things in commit msg, so I expect next version, not
resend.

Best regards,
Krzysztof