[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9b051af-b4c7-49cb-aab5-74450bca7288@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:48:10 +0800
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC: Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>, Herbert Xu
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Patrisious Haddad
<phaddad@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-rc] xfrm: replay: Fix the update of
replay_esn->oseq_hi for GSO
On 11/12/2024 8:10 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
>
> When skb needs GSO and wrap around happens, if xo->seq.low (seqno of
> the first skb segment) is before the last seq number but oseq (seqno
> of the last segment) is after it, xo->seq.low is still bigger than
> replay_esn->oseq while oseq is smaller than it, so the update of
> replay_esn->oseq_hi is missed for this case wrap around because of
> the change in the cited commit.
>
> For example, if sending a packet with gso_segs=3 while old
> replay_esn->oseq=0xfffffffe, we calculate:
> xo->seq.low = 0xfffffffe + 1 = 0x0xffffffff
> oseq = 0xfffffffe + 3 = 0x1
> (oseq < replay_esn->oseq) is true, but (xo->seq.low <
> replay_esn->oseq) is false, so replay_esn->oseq_hi is not incremented.
>
> To fix this issue, change the outer checking back for the update of
> replay_esn->oseq_hi. And add new checking inside for the update of
> packet's oseq_hi.
>
> Fixes: 4b549ccce941 ("xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO")
> Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> index bc56c6305725..235bbefc2aba 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> @@ -714,10 +714,12 @@ static int xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff
> oseq += skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely(xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq)) {
> - XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = ++oseq_hi;
> - xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi;
> - replay_esn->oseq_hi = oseq_hi;
> + if (unlikely(oseq < replay_esn->oseq)) {
> + replay_esn->oseq_hi = ++oseq_hi;
> + if (xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq) {
> + XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = oseq_hi;
> + xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi;
> + }
> if (replay_esn->oseq_hi == 0) {
> replay_esn->oseq--;
> replay_esn->oseq_hi--;
Gentle ping ...
Thanks!
Jianbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists