netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3] net: phy: fix phy_ethtool_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7bbca8a-23af-4f1d-8112-8ad94d3fa870@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 13:08:14 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: phy: fix phy_ethtool_set_eee() incorrectly
 enabling LPI

On 11/28/24 12:13, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:44:37AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> AFAICS this patch has no kconfig implication, so my local build should
>> be a safe-enough test, but please wait for the pre-reqs being merged for
>> future submissions.
> 
> I guess there's no way to tell the CI tests that another patch is
> required? It would be useful if something like a message-id could
> indicate to the CI tests that the patch in that message-id is
> required.

Not yet. I guess the main road-blocker is the limited time avail for
such developments (mostly Jakub's spare time). Feel free to contribute
to such feature to the CI infra (https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa),
if time and will allow.

Thanks,

Paolo