[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241202090040.1110280-9-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:55:42 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net 08/15] can: ifi_canfd: ifi_canfd_handle_lec_err(): fix {rx,tx}_errors statistics
From: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
The ifi_canfd_handle_lec_err() function was incorrectly incrementing only
the receive error counter, even in cases of bit or acknowledgment errors
that occur during transmission.
Fix the issue by incrementing the appropriate counter based on the
type of error.
Fixes: 5bbd655a8bd0 ("can: ifi: Add more detailed error reporting")
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241122221650.633981-8-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
index d32b10900d2f..c86b57d47085 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c
@@ -390,36 +390,55 @@ static int ifi_canfd_handle_lec_err(struct net_device *ndev)
return 0;
priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++;
- stats->rx_errors++;
/* Propagate the error condition to the CAN stack. */
skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf);
- if (unlikely(!skb))
- return 0;
/* Read the error counter register and check for new errors. */
- cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR;
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_OVERLOAD_FIRST)
- cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_OVERLOAD;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_OVERLOAD_FIRST) {
+ stats->rx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_OVERLOAD;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_ACK_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_ACK_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->tx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_ACK;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_BIT0_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_BIT0_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->tx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT0;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_BIT1_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_BIT1_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->tx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT1;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_STUFF_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_STUFF_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->rx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_CRC_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_CRC_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->rx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[3] = CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ;
+ }
- if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_FORM_ERROR_FIRST)
- cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
+ if (errctr & IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_FORM_ERROR_FIRST) {
+ stats->rx_errors++;
+ if (likely(skb))
+ cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM;
+ }
/* Reset the error counter, ack the IRQ and re-enable the counter. */
writel(IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_ER_RESET, priv->base + IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR);
@@ -427,6 +446,9 @@ static int ifi_canfd_handle_lec_err(struct net_device *ndev)
priv->base + IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT);
writel(IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR_ER_ENABLE, priv->base + IFI_CANFD_ERROR_CTR);
+ if (unlikely(!skb))
+ return 0;
+
netif_receive_skb(skb);
return 1;
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists