lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5qiehbnmzufzqjgn2l4jcghebdx7llr52lgl7hi2jizpg7gfnd@c73bpxxxdeiv>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 12:49:54 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, richardcochran@...il.com, 
	yangbo.lu@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: Switch back to struct platform_driver::remove()

Hello Geert,

thanks for pointing out this conflict.

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:48:36AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 1:30 AM <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org> wrote:
> > This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 15:53:49 +0100 you wrote:
> > > After commit 0edb555a65d1 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove()
> > > return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for
> > > platform drivers.
> > >
> > > Convert all platform drivers below drivers/ptp to use .remove(), with
> > > the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As
> > > .remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done
> > > by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - ptp: Switch back to struct platform_driver::remove()
> >     https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b32913a5609a
> 
> Note that this now conflicts with commit e70140ba0d2b1a30 ("Get rid of
> 'remove_new' relic from platform driver struct") upstream.

Indeed. The differences are only about whitespace.

> Resolution: just take the version from upstream.

But IMHO my variant is better than Linus's. After Linus' change the =
for .probe and .remove are aligned in the conflicting files. However the
other members initialized there are only using a single space before the
=. My change used the single space variant consistently for the whole
initializer.

So I suggest to either drop my change, or in the conflict resolution
take my variant and not Linus's.

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ