netdev - [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enforce same type port association for multiport RoCE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88699500f690dff1c1852c1ddb71f8a1cc8b956e.1733233480.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2024 15:45:37 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enforce same type port association for multiport RoCE

From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>

Different core device types such as PFs and VFs shouldn't be affiliated
together since they have different capabilities, fix that by enforcing
type check before doing the affiliation.

Fixes: 32f69e4be269 ("{net, IB}/mlx5: Manage port association for multiport RoCE")
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 6 ++++--
 include/linux/mlx5/driver.h       | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index bc7930d0c564..c2314797afc9 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@ -3639,7 +3639,8 @@ static int mlx5_ib_init_multiport_master(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
 		list_for_each_entry(mpi, &mlx5_ib_unaffiliated_port_list,
 				    list) {
 			if (dev->sys_image_guid == mpi->sys_image_guid &&
-			    (mlx5_core_native_port_num(mpi->mdev) - 1) == i) {
+			    (mlx5_core_native_port_num(mpi->mdev) - 1) == i &&
+			    mlx5_core_same_coredev_type(dev->mdev, mpi->mdev)) {
 				bound = mlx5_ib_bind_slave_port(dev, mpi);
 			}
 
@@ -4785,7 +4786,8 @@ static int mlx5r_mp_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&mlx5_ib_multiport_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &mlx5_ib_dev_list, ib_dev_list) {
-		if (dev->sys_image_guid == mpi->sys_image_guid)
+		if (dev->sys_image_guid == mpi->sys_image_guid &&
+		    mlx5_core_same_coredev_type(dev->mdev, mpi->mdev))
 			bound = mlx5_ib_bind_slave_port(dev, mpi);
 
 		if (bound) {
diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
index fc7e6153b73d..4f9e6f6dbaab 100644
--- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
@@ -1202,6 +1202,12 @@ static inline bool mlx5_core_is_vf(const struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 	return dev->coredev_type == MLX5_COREDEV_VF;
 }
 
+static inline bool mlx5_core_same_coredev_type(const struct mlx5_core_dev *dev1,
+					       const struct mlx5_core_dev *dev2)
+{
+	return dev1->coredev_type == dev2->coredev_type;
+}
+
 static inline bool mlx5_core_is_ecpf(const struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 {
 	return dev->caps.embedded_cpu;
-- 
2.47.0