lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4784997-08ad-0300-0472-d4a98963000b@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:24:16 +0000
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
To: alejandro.lucero-palau@....com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, martin.habets@...inx.com,
 edward.cree@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 16/28] sfc: obtain root decoder with enough HPA free
 space


On 12/3/24 14:34, Martin Habets wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 05:12:10PM +0000, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>>
>> Asking for availbale HPA space is the previous step to try to obtain
>> an HPA range suitable to accel driver purposes.
>>
>> Add this call to efx cxl initialization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
> One comment below.
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> index d03fa9f9c421..79b93d92f9c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>   	struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
>>   	struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>>   	struct resource res;
>> +	resource_size_t max;
>>   	u16 dvsec;
>>   	int rc;
>>   
>> @@ -102,6 +103,23 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>   		goto err3;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	cxl->cxlrd = cxl_get_hpa_freespace(cxl->cxlmd,
>> +					   CXL_DECODER_F_RAM | CXL_DECODER_F_TYPE2,
>> +					   &max);
>> +
>> +	if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlrd)) {
>> +		pci_err(pci_dev, "cxl_get_hpa_freespace failed\n");
>> +		rc = PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlrd);
>> +		goto err3;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (max < EFX_CTPIO_BUFFER_SIZE) {
>> +		pci_err(pci_dev, "%s: no enough free HPA space %llu < %u\n",
>> +			__func__, max, EFX_CTPIO_BUFFER_SIZE);
> Seems it should use %pa[p] for max here.


Yes, I was looking at how to fix it after the robot warning.

I'll change it.

Thanks


> Martin
>
>> +		rc = -ENOSPC;
>> +		goto err3;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	probe_data->cxl = cxl;
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ