lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bb90d44-1658-446a-99ff-b4ecbeef5b54@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 00:47:21 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ansuelsmth@...il.com,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] simplify with devm

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 02:16:42PM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Makes probe simpler and easier to reason about.

Hi Rosen

For all future patches, please say either:

Test on real hardware.

or

Compile tested only

We need to know this to help determine the risk of accepting the
patches. Clearly something you have tested is a lot lower risk than
something which is only compile tested.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ