[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bb90d44-1658-446a-99ff-b4ecbeef5b54@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 00:47:21 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ansuelsmth@...il.com,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] simplify with devm
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 02:16:42PM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Makes probe simpler and easier to reason about.
Hi Rosen
For all future patches, please say either:
Test on real hardware.
or
Compile tested only
We need to know this to help determine the risk of accepting the
patches. Clearly something you have tested is a lot lower risk than
something which is only compile tested.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists