[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241205145519.1236778-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:55:14 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net 0/5] Ocelot PTP fixes
This is another attempt at "net: mscc: ocelot: be resilient to loss of
PTP packets during transmission".
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241203164755.16115-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
The central change is in patch 4/5. It recovers a port from a very
reproducible condition where previously, it would become unable to take
any hardware TX timestamp.
Then we have patches 1/5 and 5/5 which are extra bug fixes.
Patches 2/5 and 3/5 are logical changes split out of the monolithic
patch previously submitted as v1, so that patch 4/5 is hopefully easier
to follow.
Vladimir Oltean (5):
net: mscc: ocelot: fix memory leak on ocelot_port_add_txtstamp_skb()
net: mscc: ocelot: improve handling of TX timestamp for unknown skb
net: mscc: ocelot: ocelot->ts_id_lock and ocelot_port->tx_skbs.lock
are IRQ-safe
net: mscc: ocelot: be resilient to loss of PTP packets during
transmission
net: mscc: ocelot: perform error cleanup in ocelot_hwstamp_set()
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c | 209 +++++++++++++++----------
include/linux/dsa/ocelot.h | 1 +
include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h | 2 -
3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists