lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: 
 <173336943950.1431012.10844708315992493621.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 03:30:39 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] net: add negotiation of in-band capabilities

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:30:19 +0000 you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is a repost without RFC for this series, shrunk down to 13 patches
> by removing the non-Marvell PCS.
> 
> Phylink's handling of in-band has been deficient for a long time, and
> people keep hitting problems with it. Notably, situations with the way-
> to-late standardized 2500Base-X and whether that should or should not
> have in-band enabled. We have also been carrying a hack in the form of
> phylink_phy_no_inband() for a PHY that has been used on a SFP module,
> but has no in-band capabilities, not even for SGMII.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,01/13] net: phylink: pass phylink and pcs into phylink_pcs_neg_mode()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/17ed1911f9c8
  - [net-next,02/13] net: phylink: split cur_link_an_mode into requested and active
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1f92ead7e150
  - [net-next,03/13] net: phylink: add debug for phylink_major_config()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4e7d000286fe
  - [net-next,04/13] net: phy: add phy_inband_caps()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b4c7698dd95f
  - [net-next,05/13] net: phy: bcm84881: implement phy_inband_caps() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c64c7fa0a774
  - [net-next,06/13] net: phy: marvell: implement phy_inband_caps() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1c86828dff88
  - [net-next,07/13] net: phy: add phy_config_inband()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5d58a890c027
  - [net-next,08/13] net: phy: marvell: implement config_inband() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a219912e0fec
  - [net-next,09/13] net: phylink: add pcs_inband_caps() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/df874f9e52c3
  - [net-next,10/13] net: mvneta: implement pcs_inband_caps() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/513e8fb8fa32
  - [net-next,11/13] net: mvpp2: implement pcs_inband_caps() method
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d4169f0c7665
  - [net-next,12/13] net: phylink: add negotiation of in-band capabilities
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5fd0f1a02e75
  - [net-next,13/13] net: phylink: remove phylink_phy_no_inband()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/77ac9a8b2536

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ