[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241206181345.3eccfca4@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 18:13:45 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Andrew Lunn"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V5 00/11] net/mlx5: ConnectX-8 SW Steering +
Rate management on traffic classes
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 00:09:20 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
> This patch series extends the devlink-rate API to support traffic class
> (TC) bandwidth management, enabling more granular control over traffic
> shaping and rate limiting across multiple TCs. The API now allows users
> to specify bandwidth proportions for different traffic classes in a
> single command. This is particularly useful for managing Enhanced
> Transmission Selection (ETS) for groups of Virtual Functions (VFs),
> allowing precise bandwidth allocation across traffic classes.
>
> Additionally the series refines the QoS handling in net/mlx5 to support
> TC arbitration and bandwidth management on vports and rate nodes.
>
> Extend devlink-rate API to support rate management on TCs:
> - devlink: Extend the devlink rate API to support traffic class
> bandwidth management
>
> Introduce a no-op implementation:
> - net/mlx5: Add no-op implementation for setting tc-bw on rate objects
>
> Add support for enabling and disabling TC QoS on vports and nodes:
> - net/mlx5: Add support for setting tc-bw on nodes
> - net/mlx5: Add traffic class scheduling support for vport QoS
>
> Support for setting tc-bw on rate objects:
> - net/mlx5: Manage TC arbiter nodes and implement full support for
> tc-bw
Do you expect TC bw allocation to work on non-leaf nodes?
How does this relate to the rate API which Paolo added? He was asked
to build in a way to integrate with devlink now devlink is growing
extra features again, which presumably the other API will also need.
And the integration may turn out to be challenging.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists