netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 02/11] net-timestamp: prepare for bpf prog use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241207173803.90744-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  8 Dec 2024 01:37:54 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
	willemb@...gle.com,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	eddyz87@...il.com,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 02/11] net-timestamp: prepare for bpf prog use

From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>

Later, I would introduce three points to report some information
to user space based on this.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h |  7 +++++++
 net/core/sock.c    | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 0dd464ba9e46..f88a00108a2f 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2920,6 +2920,13 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
 			  struct so_timestamping timestamping);
 
 void sock_enable_timestamps(struct sock *sk);
+#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
+void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op);
+#else
+static inline void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
+{
+}
+#endif
 void sock_no_linger(struct sock *sk);
 void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk);
 void sock_set_priority(struct sock *sk, u32 priority);
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 74729d20cd00..79cb5c74c76c 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -941,6 +941,21 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int optname,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
+void bpf_skops_tx_timestamping(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int op)
+{
+	struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
+
+	sock_owned_by_me(sk);
+
+	memset(&sock_ops, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, temp));
+	sock_ops.op = op;
+	sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
+	sock_ops.sk = sk;
+	__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops(sk, &sock_ops, CGROUP_SOCK_OPS);
+}
+#endif
+
 void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	lock_sock(sk);
-- 
2.37.3