[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241207182413.63a2c11a@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 18:24:13 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/2] net: napi: add CPU affinity to
napi->config
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 17:12:08 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> +static inline void
> +netif_napi_affinity_notify(struct irq_affinity_notify *notify,
> + const cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> + struct napi_struct *napi =
> + container_of(notify, struct napi_struct, affinity_notify);
> +
> + if (napi->config)
> + cpumask_copy(&napi->config->affinity_mask, mask);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +netif_napi_affinity_release(struct kref __always_unused *ref) {}
>
> static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
> {
> napi->irq = irq;
> +
> + if (irq > 0 && napi->config) {
> + napi->affinity_notify.notify = netif_napi_affinity_notify;
> + napi->affinity_notify.release = netif_napi_affinity_release;
> + irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq, &napi->affinity_notify);
> + irq_set_affinity(irq, &napi->config->affinity_mask);
> + }
> }
Nice, thanks for following up!
Let's move this code to net/core/dev.c or a new file, it's getting
complex for a static inline since there's no perf implication.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists