lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z1aDWTa2VzXiPpNf@mev-dev.igk.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 06:42:49 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	horms@...nel.org, michal.kubiak@...el.com, pkshih@...ltek.com,
	larry.chiu@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtase: Refine the if statement

On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:41:58AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:44:58 +0100 Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > I am not sure if it is worth to change.
> 
> True, tho, FWIW, if it's the maintainer of the codebase sending the
> change it's generally fine. Our "no pointless churn" rule is primarily
> for randoes.

Sure, thanks for letting me know.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ