netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip,ksz: Improve example to a working one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMdwsN9Jau47fhnQ8+DXsURQUgDUnDjpB98HHS_MNS4wvfOTMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:02:37 +0100
From: Jesse Van Gavere <jesseevg@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, 
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, Jesse Van Gavere <jesse.vangavere@...oteq.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip,ksz: Improve
 example to a working one

Hello Krystof,

I can understand that from a code maintenance point of view, in that
case I will not continue with this patch, thank you for the feedback.

Best regards,
Jesse

Op vr 13 dec 2024 om 10:50 schreef Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>:
>
> The point of the example is to show this device, not everything, so
> adding there nodes which are not covered by the binding is usually not
> what we expect.
>
> For example what ethernet ports are might be pretty obvious, considering
> they are already defined by child schema which is supposed to bring you
> full example and full description, thus parent schema does not have to
> be detailed.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>