[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213102317.GH2110@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:23:17 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
Cc: alejandro.lucero-palau@....com, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
martin.habets@...inx.com, edward.cree@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 24/28] cxl: add region flag for precluding a device
memory to be used for dax
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:47:42AM +0000, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>
> On 12/12/24 18:44, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:54:25PM +0000, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
> > > From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> > >
> > > By definition a type2 cxl device will use the host managed memory for
> > > specific functionality, therefore it should not be available to other
> > > uses. However, a dax interface could be just good enough in some cases.
> > >
> > > Add a flag to a cxl region for specifically state to not create a dax
> > > device. Allow a Type2 driver to set that flag at region creation time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 3 +++
> > > drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 3 ++-
> > > include/cxl/cxl.h | 3 ++-
> > > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > > index b014f2fab789..b39086356d74 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > > @@ -3562,7 +3562,8 @@ __construct_new_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> > > * cxl_region driver.
> > > */
> > > struct cxl_region *cxl_create_region(struct cxl_root_decoder *cxlrd,
> > > - struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled)
> > > + struct cxl_endpoint_decoder *cxled,
> > > + bool no_dax)
> > nit: no_dax should be added to the Kernel doc for this function.
>
>
> Yes, I'll do.
>
>
> >
> > Also, I think you need to squash the following patch, which updates
> > the caller to use pass the extra argument, into this patch. Or otherwise
> > rework things slightly to avoid breaking bisection.
>
>
> Correct. Ed raised this concern as well, and I'll change the patches order
> in v8 for avoiding the problem.
Thanks, and sorry for missing that Ed had already raised this.
Likewise, thanks for responding to my other feedback on this patchset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists