[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ed2bu3yx.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:06:46 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, Adrien
Vasseur <avasseur@...udflare.com>, Lee Valentine
<lvalentine@...udflare.com>, kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Make TIME-WAIT reuse delay
deterministic and configurable
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:38 PM +01, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> Packetdrill tests
> -----------------
>
> The packetdrill tests for TIME-WAIT reuse [3] did not change since v1.
> Although we are not touching PAWS code any more, I would still like to add
> tests to cover PAWS reject after TW reuse. This, however, requires patching
> packetdrill as I mentioned in the last cover letter [2].
Thank you for the prompt reviews. Happy to hear there are other users
looking to adopt these.
Since patches are now in net-next, I have moved the accompanying
packetdrill PR from Draft to Open, if you want to follow that work:
https://github.com/google/packetdrill/pull/90
Powered by blists - more mailing lists