[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213135437.44216-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:54:37 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
<chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<matttbe@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<sfrench@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 11/15] socket: Remove kernel socket conversion.
From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:45:20 +0100
> > diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > index 6e93f188a908..7b0de80b3aca 100644
> > --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> > @@ -3310,25 +3310,8 @@ static const struct proto_ops smc_sock_ops = {
> >
> > int smc_create_clcsk(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, int family)
> > {
> > - struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
> > - int rc;
> > -
> > - rc = sock_create_kern(net, family, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP,
> > - &smc->clcsock);
> > - if (rc)
> > - return rc;
> > -
> > - /* smc_clcsock_release() does not wait smc->clcsock->sk's
> > - * destruction; its sk_state might not be TCP_CLOSE after
> > - * smc->sk is close()d, and TCP timers can be fired later,
> > - * which need net ref.
> > - */
> > - sk = smc->clcsock->sk;
> > - __netns_tracker_free(net, &sk->ns_tracker, false);
> > - sk->sk_net_refcnt = 1;
> > - get_net_track(net, &sk->ns_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - sock_inuse_add(net, 1);
> I don't think this line shoud be removed. Otherwise, the popurse here to
> manage the per namespace statistics in the case of network namespace
> isolation would be lost.
Now it's counted in sk_alloc().
sock_create_net() below passes hold_net=true to sk_alloc() and if
sk->sk_netns_refcnt (== hold_net) is true, sock_inuse_add() is
called there.
See patch 9 and 10:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241213092152.14057-10-kuniyu@amazon.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241213092152.14057-11-kuniyu@amazon.com/
> @D. Wythe, could you please check it again? Maybe you have some good
> testing on this case.
>
> > - return 0;
> > + return sock_create_net(net, family, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP,
> > + &smc_sk(sk)->clcsock);
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists