[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241213082837.7994-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:28:37 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
CC: <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>, <jlayton@...nel.org>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<matttbe@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<sfrench@...ba.org>, <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/15] socket: Remove kernel socket conversion.
From: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:35:39 +0000
> On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 18:20 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:38:26 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > > + net = rds_conn_net(conn);
> > > +
> > > if (rds_conn_path_up(cp)) {
> > > mutex_unlock(&tc->t_conn_path_lock);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + if (!maybe_get_net(net))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > FWIW missing unlock here.
Thanks for catching!
>
> Oh, good catch! Yes, we need a mutex unlock before the return -EINVAL. Kuniyuki, can you send an update? Thanks!
>
Yes, will do.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists