[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfaa3a15-84af-3384-6be4-bb883164d3ae@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:46:03 +0000
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, martin.habets@...inx.com, edward.cree@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 23/28] sfc: create cxl region
On 12/12/24 18:29, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:54:24PM +0000, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>>
>> Use cxl api for creating a region using the endpoint decoder related to
>> a DPA range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> index 09827bb9e861..9b34795f7853 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> @@ -128,10 +128,19 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>> goto err3;
>> }
>>
>> + cxl->efx_region = cxl_create_region(cxl->cxlrd, cxl->cxled);
>> + if (!cxl->efx_region) {
>> + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel create region failed");
>> + rc = PTR_ERR(cxl->efx_region);
>> + goto err_region;
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> This is similar to my feedback on patch 18/28.
>
> Looking over the implementation of cxl_create_region it seems
> that it returns either a valid pointer or an error pointer, but
> not NULL. If so, I think the correct condition would be
> (completely untested):
>
> if (IS_ERR(cxl->efx_region)
>
> But if cxl->efx_region can be NULL then rc, the return value of this
> function, will be set to zero. Which doesn't seem correct given
> the error message above.
I'll fix it with the IS_ERR check which seems the proper thing to do here.
Thanks!
>> + }
>> +
>> probe_data->cxl = cxl;
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> +err_region:
>> + cxl_dpa_free(cxl->cxled);
>> err3:
>> cxl_release_resource(cxl->cxlds, CXL_RES_RAM);
>> err2:
>> @@ -144,6 +153,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>> void efx_cxl_exit(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>> {
>> if (probe_data->cxl) {
>> + cxl_accel_region_detach(probe_data->cxl->cxled);
>> cxl_dpa_free(probe_data->cxl->cxled);
>> cxl_release_resource(probe_data->cxl->cxlds, CXL_RES_RAM);
>> kfree(probe_data->cxl->cxlds);
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists