[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241215175629.1248773-3-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 17:56:27 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] inetpeer: remove create argument of inet_getpeer()
All callers of inet_getpeer() want to create an inetpeer.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
include/net/inetpeer.h | 7 +++----
net/ipv4/inetpeer.c | 11 ++---------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/inetpeer.h b/include/net/inetpeer.h
index 6f51f81d6cb19c623e9b347dbdbbd8d849848f6e..f475757daafba998a10c815d0178c98d2bf1ae43 100644
--- a/include/net/inetpeer.h
+++ b/include/net/inetpeer.h
@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ static inline struct in6_addr *inetpeer_get_addr_v6(struct inetpeer_addr *iaddr)
/* can be called with or without local BH being disabled */
struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer(struct inet_peer_base *base,
- const struct inetpeer_addr *daddr,
- int create);
+ const struct inetpeer_addr *daddr);
static inline struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer_v4(struct inet_peer_base *base,
__be32 v4daddr,
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ static inline struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer_v4(struct inet_peer_base *base,
daddr.a4.addr = v4daddr;
daddr.a4.vif = vif;
daddr.family = AF_INET;
- return inet_getpeer(base, &daddr, 1);
+ return inet_getpeer(base, &daddr);
}
static inline struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer_v6(struct inet_peer_base *base,
@@ -118,7 +117,7 @@ static inline struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer_v6(struct inet_peer_base *base,
daddr.a6 = *v6daddr;
daddr.family = AF_INET6;
- return inet_getpeer(base, &daddr, 1);
+ return inet_getpeer(base, &daddr);
}
static inline int inetpeer_addr_cmp(const struct inetpeer_addr *a,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
index 5ab56f4cb529769d4edb07261c08d61ff96f0c0f..bc79cc9d13ebb4691660f51babbc748900b8f6db 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
@@ -169,13 +169,11 @@ static void inet_peer_gc(struct inet_peer_base *base,
}
struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer(struct inet_peer_base *base,
- const struct inetpeer_addr *daddr,
- int create)
+ const struct inetpeer_addr *daddr)
{
struct inet_peer *p, *gc_stack[PEER_MAX_GC];
struct rb_node **pp, *parent;
unsigned int gc_cnt, seq;
- int invalidated;
/* Attempt a lockless lookup first.
* Because of a concurrent writer, we might not find an existing entry.
@@ -183,16 +181,11 @@ struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer(struct inet_peer_base *base,
rcu_read_lock();
seq = read_seqbegin(&base->lock);
p = lookup(daddr, base, seq, NULL, &gc_cnt, &parent, &pp);
- invalidated = read_seqretry(&base->lock, seq);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (p)
return p;
- /* If no writer did a change during our lookup, we can return early. */
- if (!create && !invalidated)
- return NULL;
-
/* retry an exact lookup, taking the lock before.
* At least, nodes should be hot in our cache.
*/
@@ -201,7 +194,7 @@ struct inet_peer *inet_getpeer(struct inet_peer_base *base,
gc_cnt = 0;
p = lookup(daddr, base, seq, gc_stack, &gc_cnt, &parent, &pp);
- if (!p && create) {
+ if (!p) {
p = kmem_cache_alloc(peer_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (p) {
p->daddr = *daddr;
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists