lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: 
 <173429823099.3585316.12907966837487758399.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 21:30:30 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, andrew@...n.ch, claudiu.manoil@....com,
 alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 jacob.e.keller@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in
 ocelot_ifh_set_basic()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:55:45 +0200 you wrote:
> Packets injected by the CPU should have a SRC_PORT field equal to the
> CPU port module index in the Analyzer block (ocelot->num_phys_ports).
> 
> The blamed commit copied the ocelot_ifh_set_basic() call incorrectly
> from ocelot_xmit_common() in net/dsa/tag_ocelot.c. Instead of calling
> with "x", it calls with BIT_ULL(x), but the field is not a port mask,
> but rather a single port index.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: mscc: ocelot: fix incorrect IFH SRC_PORT field in ocelot_ifh_set_basic()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/2d5df3a680ff

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ