netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: phylink: improve phylink_sfp_config_phy() error message with missing PHY driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <173429942851.3588300.14931705727998562399.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 21:50:28 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, andrew@...n.ch,
 hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: phylink: improve phylink_sfp_config_phy()
 error message with missing PHY driver

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 16:08:34 +0200 you wrote:
> It seems that phylink does not support driving PHYs in SFP modules using
> the Generic PHY or Generic Clause 45 PHY driver. I've come to this
> conclusion after analyzing these facts:
> 
> - sfp_sm_probe_phy(), who is our caller here, first calls
>   phy_device_register() and then sfp_add_phy() -> ... ->
>   phylink_sfp_connect_phy().
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3,net-next] net: phylink: improve phylink_sfp_config_phy() error message with missing PHY driver
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ffcbfb5f9779

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html