[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241216142156.4133267-4-yangerkun@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:21:54 +0800
From: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...weicloud.com>
To: chuck.lever@...cle.com,
jlayton@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de,
okorniev@...hat.com,
Dai.Ngo@...cle.com,
tom@...pey.com,
trondmy@...nel.org,
anna@...nel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: yangerkun@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...weicloud.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] nfsd: no need get cache ref when protected by rcu
From: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock has already protect any ptr we will
reference when we call e_show. No need get cache ref. Besides, exp_put
may drop the last ref for cache_head, and the .put like
expkey_put/svc_export_put will call dput, which may sleep, and this will
break rcu protection.
Fixes: ae74136b4bb6 ("SUNRPC: Allow cache lookups to use RCU protection rather than the r/w spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
---
fs/nfsd/export.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c
index 56002d9ef66b..1c795dc5a74b 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/export.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c
@@ -1427,15 +1427,9 @@ static int e_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
return 0;
}
- if (!cache_get_rcu(&exp->h))
+ if (cache_check(cd, &exp->h, NULL))
return 0;
- if (cache_check(cd, &exp->h, NULL)) {
- cache_put(&exp->h, cd);
- return 0;
- }
-
- exp_put(exp);
return svc_export_show(m, cd, cp);
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists