[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241216171201.274644-7-idosch@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:11:58 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <gnault@...hat.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <petrm@...dia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] ipv6: Add flow label to route get requests
The default IPv6 multipath hash policy takes the flow label into account
when calculating a multipath hash and previous patches added a flow
label selector to IPv6 FIB rules.
Allow user space to specify a flow label in route get requests by adding
a new netlink attribute and using its value to populate the "flowlabel"
field in the IPv6 flow info structure prior to a route lookup.
Deny the attribute in RTM_{NEW,DEL}ROUTE requests by checking for it in
rtm_to_fib6_config() and returning an error if present.
A subsequent patch will use this capability to test the new flow label
selector in IPv6 FIB rules.
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/route.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
index eccc0e7dcb7d..5ee94c511a28 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ enum rtattr_type_t {
RTA_SPORT,
RTA_DPORT,
RTA_NH_ID,
+ RTA_FLOWLABEL,
__RTA_MAX
};
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 67ff16c04718..78362822b907 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy rtm_ipv6_policy[RTA_MAX+1] = {
[RTA_SPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[RTA_DPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
[RTA_NH_ID] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [RTA_FLOWLABEL] = { .type = NLA_BE32 },
};
static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
@@ -5030,6 +5031,12 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
goto errout;
}
+ if (tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL]) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL],
+ "Flow label cannot be specified for this operation");
+ goto errout;
+ }
+
*cfg = (struct fib6_config){
.fc_table = rtm->rtm_table,
.fc_dst_len = rtm->rtm_dst_len,
@@ -6013,6 +6020,13 @@ static int inet6_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL] &&
+ (nla_get_be32(tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL]) & ~IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL],
+ "Invalid flow label");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i <= RTA_MAX; i++) {
if (!tb[i])
continue;
@@ -6027,6 +6041,7 @@ static int inet6_rtm_valid_getroute_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
case RTA_SPORT:
case RTA_DPORT:
case RTA_IP_PROTO:
+ case RTA_FLOWLABEL:
break;
default:
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported attribute in get route request");
@@ -6049,6 +6064,7 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct rtmsg *rtm;
struct flowi6 fl6 = {};
+ __be32 flowlabel;
bool fibmatch;
err = inet6_rtm_valid_getroute_req(in_skb, nlh, tb, extack);
@@ -6057,7 +6073,6 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
err = -EINVAL;
rtm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
- fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(rtm->rtm_tos, 0);
fibmatch = !!(rtm->rtm_flags & RTM_F_FIB_MATCH);
if (tb[RTA_SRC]) {
@@ -6103,6 +6118,9 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
goto errout;
}
+ flowlabel = nla_get_be32_default(tb[RTA_FLOWLABEL], 0);
+ fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(rtm->rtm_tos, flowlabel);
+
if (iif) {
struct net_device *dev;
int flags = 0;
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists