[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8510C7788E6979D1D04A18B588042@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:52:21 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, Frank Li
<frank.li@....com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"idosch@...sch.org" <idosch@...sch.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 net-next 3/4] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95
ENETC PF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Sent: 2024年12月17日 17:20
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>; Claudiu Manoil
> <claudiu.manoil@....com>; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>;
> Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>; andrew+netdev@...n.ch;
> davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; Frank Li
> <frank.li@....com>; horms@...nel.org; idosch@...sch.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 3/4] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95
> ENETC PF
>
> On 12/13/24 03:17, Wei Fang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index 09ca4223ff9d..41a3798c7564 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -533,6 +533,224 @@ static void enetc_tso_complete_csum(struct
> enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct tso_t *tso
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int enetc_lso_count_descs(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> Please, don't use inline in c files
>
> > +{
> > + /* 4 BDs: 1 BD for LSO header + 1 BD for extended BD + 1 BD
> > + * for linear area data but not include LSO header, namely
> > + * skb_headlen(skb) - lso_hdr_len. And 1 BD for gap.
> > + */
> > + return skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 4;
> > +}
> > +static int enetc_lso_hw_offload(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff
> *skb)
> > +{
> > + struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd;
> > + struct enetc_lso_t lso = {0};
> > + int err, i, count = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Initialize the LSO handler */
> > + enetc_lso_start(skb, &lso);
> > + i = tx_ring->next_to_use;
> > +
> > + enetc_lso_map_hdr(tx_ring, skb, &i, &lso);
> > + /* First BD and an extend BD */
> > + count += 2;
> > +
> > + err = enetc_lso_map_data(tx_ring, skb, &i, &lso, &count);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto dma_err;
> > +
> > + /* Go to the next BD */
> > + enetc_bdr_idx_inc(tx_ring, &i);
> > + tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
> > + enetc_update_tx_ring_tail(tx_ring);
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +
> > +dma_err:
> > + do {
> > + tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
> > + enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd);
> > + if (i == 0)
> > + i = tx_ring->bd_count;
> > + i--;
> > + } while (count--);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> I'm sorry for not catching the issue early, but apparently there is an
> off-by-one in the above loop: if 'count' bds have been used, it will
> attempt to free 'count + 1' of them.
>
> The minimal fix should be using:
>
> } while (--count);
>
> /P
Thanks for reminder, I will fix it. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists