[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z2GXsiHPjUDGl6TU@shredder>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 17:24:34 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dsahern@...nel.org,
donald.hunter@...il.com, horms@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/9] ipv6: fib_rules: Add flow label support
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:59:19PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 07:11:55PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > @@ -332,6 +334,9 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int fib6_rule_match(struct fib_rule *rule,
> > if (r->dscp && r->dscp != ip6_dscp(fl6->flowlabel))
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if ((r->flowlabel ^ flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6)) & r->flowlabel_mask)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> Personally, I'd find the following form easier to read:
> + if ((flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6) & r->flowlabel_mask) != r->flowlabel)
> + return 0;
The FIB rule code already uses the XOR form for other masked matches
('fwmark' for example), so I used it here to be consistent.
> Does GCC produce better code with the xor form?
No big difference.
Original:
static inline __be32 flowi6_get_flowlabel(const struct flowi6 *fl6)
{
return fl6->flowlabel & IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK;
b85: 81 e2 00 0f ff ff and $0xffff0f00,%edx
if ((r->flowlabel ^ flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6)) & r->flowlabel_mask)
b8b: 33 90 c0 00 00 00 xor 0xc0(%rax),%edx
b91: 23 90 c4 00 00 00 and 0xc4(%rax),%edx
return 0;
b97: 41 b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%r8d
if ((r->flowlabel ^ flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6)) & r->flowlabel_mask)
b9d: 0f 85 31 ff ff ff jne ad4 <fib6_rule_match+0x34>
Modified:
if ((flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6) & r->flowlabel_mask) != r->flowlabel)
b85: 23 90 c4 00 00 00 and 0xc4(%rax),%edx
return 0;
b8b: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d
if ((flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6) & r->flowlabel_mask) != r->flowlabel)
b8e: 81 e2 00 0f ff ff and $0xffff0f00,%edx
b94: 3b 90 c0 00 00 00 cmp 0xc0(%rax),%edx
b9a: 0f 85 34 ff ff ff jne ad4 <fib6_rule_match+0x34>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists