netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] bnxt_en: implement tcp-data-split and thresh option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241217083024.6b743b74@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:30:24 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 almasrymina@...gle.com, donald.hunter@...il.com, corbet@....net,
 michael.chan@...adcom.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, hawk@...nel.org,
 ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, dw@...idwei.uk, sdf@...ichev.me,
 asml.silence@...il.com, brett.creeley@....com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
 maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, danieller@...dia.com,
 hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, ahmed.zaki@...el.com,
 rrameshbabu@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
 bigeasy@...utronix.de, lorenzo@...nel.org, jdamato@...tly.com,
 aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, kaiyuanz@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
 daniel.zahka@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/7] bnxt_en: implement tcp-data-split and
 thresh option

On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:32:14 +0000 Taehee Yoo wrote:
> This series implements header-data-split-thresh ethtool command.
> This series also implements backend of tcp-data-split and
> header-data-split-thresh ethtool command for bnxt_en driver.
> These ethtool commands are mandatory options for device memory TCP.

Hi Taehee! Any progress on this series?
Being able to increase HDS threshold is highly beneficial for workloads
sending small RPCs, it'd be great if the changes were part of v6.14.