[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202412172115.C7FDE7BA@keescook>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:22:39 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>, morbo@...gle.com,
qing.zhao@...cle.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] net/mlx5: fs, add mlx5_fs_pool API
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 03:39:11PM +0200, Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2024 7:23 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:42:16PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> > > From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > Refactor fc_pool API to create generic fs_pool API, as HW steering has
> > > more flow steering elements which can take advantage of the same pool of
> > > bulks API. Change fs_counters code to use the fs_pool API.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_counters.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_counters.c
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > @@ -447,11 +437,9 @@ void mlx5_fc_update_sampling_interval(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
> > > /* Flow counter bluks */
> > >
> > > struct mlx5_fc_bulk {
> > > - struct list_head pool_list;
> > > + struct mlx5_fs_bulk fs_bulk;
> > > u32 base_id;
> > > - int bulk_len;
> > > - unsigned long *bitmask;
> > > - struct mlx5_fc fcs[] __counted_by(bulk_len);
> > > + struct mlx5_fc fcs[] __counted_by(fs_bulk.bulk_len);
> > > };
> >
> > Unfortunately it seems that clang-19 doesn't know how to handle
> > __counted_by() when used like this:
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_counters.c:442:36: error: 'counted_by' argument must be a simple declaration reference
> > 442 | struct mlx5_fc fcs[] __counted_by(fs_bulk.bulk_len);
>
> Thanks Simon, from code perspective, bulk_len should be now in the inner
> struct fs_bulk.
>
> Keen Cook, is that going to be supported in the future? for now I will just
> remove __counted_by() from this struct.
I am expecting this will be supported in the future, yes, but there isn't
an ETA for it yet. Neither GCC 15 nor Clang are currently supporting
sub-struct members -- the counted_by member needs to be at the same
"level" in the struct as the annotated flexible array.
Is it possible to move "base_id" above "fs_bulk" and move "fcs" into
the of end struct mlx5_fs_bulk?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists