[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bcb9ace-de01-e597-92a2-22013aa695ba@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:17:36 +0800
From: yukaixiong <yukaixiong@...wei.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@...c.org>,
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
<jack@...e.cz>, <kees@...nel.org>, <j.granados@...sung.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, <trondmy@...nel.org>, <anna@...nel.org>,
<chuck.lever@...cle.com>, <okorniev@...hat.com>, <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
<tom@...pey.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <paul@...l-moore.com>,
<jmorris@...ei.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<haifeng.xu@...pee.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, <dchinner@...hat.com>, <bfoster@...hat.com>,
<souravpanda@...gle.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
<ying.huang@...el.com>, <yang@...amperecomputing.com>,
<zev@...ilderbeest.net>, <serge@...lyn.com>, <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <sunnanyong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 11/15] sunrpc: use vfs_pressure_ratio() helper
On 2024/10/11 5:43, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 23:22 +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
>>> Use vfs_pressure_ratio() to simplify code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kaixiong Yu <yukaixiong@...wei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
>>> Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> index 04534ea537c8..3d2b51d7e934 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
>>> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static unsigned long
>>> rpcauth_cache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>>>
>>> {
>>> - return number_cred_unused * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure / 100;
>>> + return vfs_pressure_ratio(number_cred_unused);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>>
> I realise this is a bit of a tangent, and I'm not objecting to this
> patch, but I wonder what the justification is for using
> vfs_cache_pressure here. The sysctl is documented as
>
> This percentage value controls the tendency of the kernel to reclaim
> the memory which is used for caching of directory and inode objects.
>
> So it can sensibly be used for dentries and inode, and for anything
> directly related like the nfs access cache (which is attached to inodes)
> and the nfs xattr cache.
>
> But the sunrpc cred cache scales with the number of active users, not
> the number of inodes/dentries.
>
> So I think this should simply "return number_cred_unused;".
>
> What do others think?
>
> NeilBrown
>
> .
Thank you, I will receive your advice.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists