| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20241219-bpf-next-net-mptcp-bpf_iter-subflows-v2-4-ae244d3cdbbc@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:46:43 +0100
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next/net v2 4/7] bpf: Add mptcp_subflow bpf_iter
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
It's necessary to traverse all subflows on the conn_list of an MPTCP
socket and then call kfunc to modify the fields of each subflow. In
kernel space, mptcp_for_each_subflow() helper is used for this:
mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
kfunc(subflow);
But in the MPTCP BPF program, this has not yet been implemented. As
Martin suggested recently, this conn_list walking + modify-by-kfunc
usage fits the bpf_iter use case.
So this patch adds a new bpf_iter type named "mptcp_subflow" to do
this and implements its helpers bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_new()/_next()/
_destroy(). And register these bpf_iter mptcp_subflow into mptcp
common kfunc set. Then bpf_for_each() for mptcp_subflow can be used
in BPF program like this:
bpf_for_each(mptcp_subflow, subflow, msk)
kfunc(subflow);
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
---
Notes:
- v2:
- Add BUILD_BUG_ON() checks, similar to the ones done with other
bpf_iter_(...) helpers.
- Replace msk_owned_by_me() by sock_owned_by_user_nocheck() and
!spin_is_locked() (Martin).
A few versions of this single patch have been previously posted to the
BPF mailing list by Geliang, before continuing to the MPTCP mailing list
only, with other patches of this series. The version of the whole series
has been reset to 1, but here is the ChangeLog for the previous ones:
- v2: remove msk->pm.lock in _new() and _destroy() (Martin)
drop DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC, change opaque[3] to opaque[2] (Andrii)
- v3: drop bpf_iter__mptcp_subflow
- v4: if msk is NULL, initialize kit->msk to NULL in _new() and check
it in _next() (Andrii)
- v5: use list_is_last() instead of list_entry_is_head() add
KF_ITER_NEW/NEXT/DESTROY flags add msk_owned_by_me in _new()
- v6: add KF_TRUSTED_ARGS flag (Andrii, Martin)
---
net/mptcp/bpf.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/bpf.c b/net/mptcp/bpf.c
index c5bfd84c16c43230d9d8e1fd8ff781a767e647b5..e39f0e4fb683c1aa31ee075281daee218dac5878 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/bpf.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/bpf.c
@@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_mptcp_fmodret_set = {
.set = &bpf_mptcp_fmodret_ids,
};
+struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow {
+ __u64 __opaque[2];
+} __aligned(8);
+
+struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_kern {
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+ struct list_head *pos;
+} __aligned(8);
+
__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
__bpf_kfunc static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
@@ -47,10 +56,54 @@ bpf_mptcp_subflow_ctx(const struct sock *sk)
return NULL;
}
+__bpf_kfunc static int
+bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_new(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow *it,
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_kern) >
+ sizeof(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_kern) !=
+ __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow));
+
+ kit->msk = msk;
+ if (!msk)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!sock_owned_by_user_nocheck(sk) &&
+ !spin_is_locked(&sk->sk_lock.slock))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ kit->pos = &msk->conn_list;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
+bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_next(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow *it)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ if (!kit->msk || list_is_last(kit->pos, &kit->msk->conn_list))
+ return NULL;
+
+ kit->pos = kit->pos->next;
+ return list_entry(kit->pos, struct mptcp_subflow_context, node);
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc static void
+bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_destroy(struct bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow *it)
+{
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_mptcp_subflow_ctx, KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_mptcp_subflow_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_set = {
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists