lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241218184121.7117cf67@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:41:21 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 almasrymina@...gle.com, donald.hunter@...il.com, corbet@....net,
 michael.chan@...adcom.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, hawk@...nel.org,
 ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, dw@...idwei.uk, sdf@...ichev.me,
 asml.silence@...il.com, brett.creeley@....com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
 maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, danieller@...dia.com,
 hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, ahmed.zaki@...el.com,
 rrameshbabu@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
 bigeasy@...utronix.de, lorenzo@...nel.org, jdamato@...tly.com,
 aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, kaiyuanz@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
 daniel.zahka@...il.com, Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/9] bnxt_en: add support for tcp-data-split
 ethtool command

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:25:47 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > +	if (prog && bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_HDS) {
> > +		netdev_warn(dev, "XDP is disallowed when HDS is enabled.\n");
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	}  
> 
> And this check should also live in the core, now that core has access
> to dev->ethtool->hds_config ? I think you can add this check to the
> core in the same patch as the chunk referred to above.

Oh, you also already have this logic in patch 7?
So it just needs to be reordered in the series, and then the driver
doesn't need to check?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ