[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <388fe411-d06f-4cb4-b58a-a2b9b5eb08ce@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:58:57 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "Andrii
Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@...cle.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>, "Magnus
Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, "Casey
Schaufler" <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] xsk: add helper to get &xdp_desc's DMA and
meta pointer in one go
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:50:58 -0800
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:44:34 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> + ret = (typeof(ret)){
>> + /* Same logic as in xp_raw_get_dma() */
>> + .dma = (pool->dma_pages[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT] &
>> + ~XSK_NEXT_PG_CONTIG_MASK) + (addr & ~PAGE_MASK),
>> + };
>
> This is quite ugly IMHO
What exactly: that the logic is copied or how that code (>> & ~ + & ~)
looks like?
If the former, I already thought of making a couple internal defs to
avoid copying.
If the latter, I also thought of this, just wanted to be clear that it's
the same as in xp_raw_get_dma(). But it can be refactored to look more
fancy anyway.
Or the compound return looks ugly? Or the struct initialization?
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists