netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: add XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to umem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z2WXAqNY4s+OKZbB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:10:42 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
	andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: add XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to
 umem_config

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 05:18:06PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The Tx metadata test has been broken since the commit d5e726d9143c ("xsk:
> Require XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN to actuate tx_metadata_len").

Nit:

Fixes tag already include this information.

The Tx metadata test has been broken becasue XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag
is not set ....

> Because
> this change requires XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN flag to be set, otherwise
> xsk_buff_pool::tx_metadata_len will be initialized to 0, which means that
> the driver cannot get Tx metadata and cannot execute AF_XDP Tx metadata
> hooks.
>
> Fixes: d5e726d9143c ("xsk: Require XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN to actuate tx_metadata_len")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 6f9956eed797..ad6c08dfd6c8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int open_xsk(int ifindex, struct xsk *xsk, __u32 queue_id)
>  		.fill_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
>  		.comp_size = XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS,
>  		.frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE,
> -		.flags = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FLAGS,
> +		.flags = XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN,

look like "XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FLAGS | XDP_UMEM_TX_METADATA_LEN"

You clean other flags, does it what you what?

Frank

>  		.tx_metadata_len = sizeof(struct xsk_tx_metadata),
>  	};
>  	__u32 idx = 0;
> --
> 2.34.1
>