netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1 0/5] Device memory TCP TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z2ZJzAqS7ZrnREuI@mini-arch>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:53:32 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@...gle.com>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, dw@...idwei.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1 0/5] Device memory TCP TX

On 12/21, Mina Almasry wrote:
> The TX path had been dropped from the Device Memory TCP patch series
> post RFCv1 [1], to make that series slightly easier to review. This
> series rebases the implementation of the TX path on top of the
> net_iov/netmem framework agreed upon and merged. The motivation for
> the feature is thoroughly described in the docs & cover letter of the
> original proposal, so I don't repeat the lengthy descriptions here, but
> they are available in [1].
> 
> Sending this series as RFC as the winder closure is immenient. I plan on
> reposting as non-RFC once the tree re-opens, addressing any feedback
> I receive in the meantime.

Thank you for squeezing it in before the window closure. I will be off
on Monday-Wednesday, but I'll try to test it on Thursday-Friday.