lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ae923d7-3b4f-430c-bb43-edee7f549e56@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:37:30 +0800
From: Joey Lu <a0987203069@...il.com>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, ychuang3@...oton.com,
 schung@...oton.com, yclu4@...oton.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] net: stmmac: dwmac-nuvoton: Add dwmac glue for
 Nuvoton MA35 family


Przemek Kitszel 於 12/20/2024 6:59 PM 寫道:
> On 12/20/24 08:07, Joey Lu wrote:
>> Dear Przemek,
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>
> sure :)
> please also configure your email to write replies as plain-text, instead
> of HTML
Thank you for the reminder🙂
>
> I also forgot to say, that you should have target this series for the
> net-next (--subject-prefix for git-send-email)
>
May I confirm if you are referring to netdev/net-next?
>
> Please also note that your v2 should wait to be send in the new year,
> as we will begin the Winter Break for netdev ML in a moment.
>
Got it! Happy holidays! 🎉
>
>>>> +/* 2000ps is mapped to 0 ~ 0xF */
>>>> +#define PATH_DELAY_DEC      134
>>>
>>> would be great to previx your macros by NVT_
>> Got it.
>>>
>>> why 134 and not 125?
>>
>> The interval is confirmed to be 134. The mapping is as follows:
>>
>> |0000| = 0.00 ns
>> |0001| = 0.13 ns
>> |0010| = 0.27 ns
>> ...
>> |1111| = 2.00 ns
>
> thanks, that's correct, sorry for confusion
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ