netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 03/27] cxl: add capabilities field to cxl_dev_state and cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241224170855.0000295c@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:08:55 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <martin.habets@...inx.com>,
	<edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alejandro
 Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/27] cxl: add capabilities field to cxl_dev_state
 and cxl_port

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:10:18 +0000
<alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:

> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> 
> Type2 devices have some Type3 functionalities as optional like an mbox
> or an hdm decoder, and CXL core needs a way to know what an CXL accelerator
> implements.
> 
> Add a new field to cxl_dev_state for keeping device capabilities as
> discovered during initialization. Add same field to cxl_port as registers
> discovery is also used during port initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@...sung.com>

Use set_bit() not dereference and |= to set the bits in the bitmap
At that point you can void need to force the length of the bitmap.

Jonathan

> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> index 59cb35b40c7e..ac3a27c6e442 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c

> @@ -113,11 +118,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_probe_component_regs, "CXL");
>   * @dev: Host device of the @base mapping
>   * @base: Mapping of CXL 2.0 8.2.8 CXL Device Register Interface
>   * @map: Map object describing the register block information found
> + * @caps: capabilities to be set when discovered
>   *
>   * Probe for device register information and return it in map object.
>   */
>  void cxl_probe_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
> -			   struct cxl_device_reg_map *map)
> +			   struct cxl_device_reg_map *map, unsigned long *caps)
>  {
>  	int cap, cap_count;
>  	u64 cap_array;
> @@ -146,10 +152,12 @@ void cxl_probe_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
>  		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_DEVICE_STATUS:
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "found Status capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
>  			rmap = &map->status;
> +			*caps |= BIT(CXL_DEV_CAP_DEV_STATUS);
>  			break;
>  		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_PRIMARY_MAILBOX:
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "found Mailbox capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
>  			rmap = &map->mbox;
> +			*caps |= BIT(CXL_DEV_CAP_MAILBOX_PRIMARY);
>  			break;
>  		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_SECONDARY_MAILBOX:
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "found Secondary Mailbox capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
> @@ -157,6 +165,7 @@ void cxl_probe_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
>  		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_MEMDEV:
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "found Memory Device capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
>  			rmap = &map->memdev;
> +			*caps |= BIT(CXL_DEV_CAP_MEMDEV);

Ah. That would will be why the 64 below. use set_bit() for these, not a dereference.


>  			break;
>  		default:
>  			if (cap_id >= 0x8000)
> @@ -421,7 +430,7 @@ static void cxl_unmap_regblock(struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  	map->base = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_register_map *map)
> +static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_register_map *map, unsigned long *caps)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_component_reg_map *comp_map;
>  	struct cxl_device_reg_map *dev_map;
> @@ -431,12 +440,12 @@ static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  	switch (map->reg_type) {
>  	case CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT:
>  		comp_map = &map->component_map;
> -		cxl_probe_component_regs(host, base, comp_map);
> +		cxl_probe_component_regs(host, base, comp_map, caps);
>  		dev_dbg(host, "Set up component registers\n");
>  		break;
>  	case CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV:
>  		dev_map = &map->device_map;
> -		cxl_probe_device_regs(host, base, dev_map);
> +		cxl_probe_device_regs(host, base, dev_map, caps);
>  		if (!dev_map->status.valid || !dev_map->mbox.valid ||
>  		    !dev_map->memdev.valid) {
>  			dev_err(host, "registers not found: %s%s%s\n",
> @@ -455,7 +464,7 @@ static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  	return 0;
>  }

> diff --git a/include/cxl/cxl.h b/include/cxl/cxl.h
> index 19e5d883557a..f656fcd4945f 100644
> --- a/include/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,25 @@ enum cxl_resource {
>  	CXL_RES_PMEM,
>  };
>  
> +/* Capabilities as defined for:
> + *
> + *	Component Registers (Table 8-22 CXL 3.1 specification)
> + *	Device Registers (8.2.8.2.1 CXL 3.1 specification)
> + *
> + * and currently being used for kernel CXL support.
> + */
> +
> +enum cxl_dev_cap {
> +	/* capabilities from Component Registers */
> +	CXL_DEV_CAP_RAS,
> +	CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM,
> +	/* capabilities from Device Registers */
> +	CXL_DEV_CAP_DEV_STATUS,
> +	CXL_DEV_CAP_MAILBOX_PRIMARY,
> +	CXL_DEV_CAP_MEMDEV,
> +	CXL_MAX_CAPS = 64

Why set it to 64?  All the bitmaps etc will autosize so
you just need to ensure you use correct set_bit() and test_bit()
that are happy dealing with bitmaps of multiple longs.


> +};
> +
>  struct cxl_dev_state *cxl_accel_state_create(struct device *dev);
>  
>  void cxl_set_dvsec(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u16 dvsec);