[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241225065908.1547645-3-yangerkun@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 14:59:06 +0800
From: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
To: chuck.lever@...cle.com,
jlayton@...nel.org,
neilb@...e.de,
okorniev@...hat.com,
Dai.Ngo@...cle.com,
tom@...pey.com,
trondmy@...nel.org,
anna@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yangerkun@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...weicloud.com,
liumingrui@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] nfsd: no need get cache ref when protected by rcu
rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock has already provide protection for the
pointer we will reference when we call e_show. Therefore, there is no
need to obtain a cache reference to help protect cache_head.
Additionally, the .put such as expkey_put/svc_export_put will invoke
dput, which can sleep and break rcu. Stop get cache reference to fix
them all.
Fixes: ae74136b4bb6 ("SUNRPC: Allow cache lookups to use RCU protection rather than the r/w spinlock")
Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
---
fs/nfsd/export.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c
index aa4712362b3b..c6168bccfb6c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/export.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c
@@ -1425,13 +1425,9 @@ static int e_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
return 0;
}
- if (!cache_get_rcu(&exp->h))
+ if (cache_check_rcu(cd, &exp->h, NULL))
return 0;
- if (cache_check(cd, &exp->h, NULL))
- return 0;
-
- exp_put(exp);
return svc_export_show(m, cd, cp);
}
--
2.46.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists