lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <624fcb6f-6f00-3b25-8057-0eed227e8156@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 08:05:01 +0000
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
 alejandro.lucero-palau@....com
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 dan.j.williams@...el.com, martin.habets@...inx.com, edward.cree@....com,
 davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/27] sfc: use cxl api for regs setup and checking


On 12/24/24 17:23, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:10:22 +0000
> alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
>
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>>
>> Use cxl code for registers discovery and mapping.
>>
>> Validate capabilities found based on those registers against expected
>> capabilities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhi@...dia.com>
>> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> Similar comments to on the earlier bitmap manipulation.
> It is simpler than you have here!


Yes, thanks.

I'll change it.


>
> Jonathan
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> index 356d7a977e1c..d9a52343553a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>>   int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>   {
>>   	struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
>> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(found, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
>>   	struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
>>   	struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>>   	struct resource res;
>> @@ -65,6 +67,24 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>   		goto err_resource_set;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	rc = cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(pci_dev, cxl->cxlds);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel setup regs failed");
>> +		goto err_resource_set;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	bitmap_clear(expected, 0, CXL_MAX_CAPS);
>> +	bitmap_set(expected, CXL_DEV_CAP_HDM, 1);
> set_bit()
>
>> +	bitmap_set(expected, CXL_DEV_CAP_RAS, 1);
>> +
>> +	if (!cxl_pci_check_caps(cxl->cxlds, expected, found)) {
>> +		pci_err(pci_dev,
>> +			"CXL device capabilities found(%08lx) not as expected(%08lx)",
> bitmap format strings, not dereferencing the unsigned longs.
>
>> +			*found, *expected);
>> +		rc = -EIO;
>> +		goto err_resource_set;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	probe_data->cxl = cxl;
>>   
>>   	return 0;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ