[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877c7ha77n.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:46:52 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, Thinh Nguyen
<Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Richard Weinberger
<richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Damien Le Moal
<dlemoal@...nel.org>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime
Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards
to pm_sleep_ptr()
Hello Raphael,
On 29/12/2024 at 00:32:42 +01, Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com> wrote:
> Letting the compiler remove these functions when the kernel is built
> without CONFIG_PM_SLEEP support is simpler and less error prone than the
> use of #ifdef based kernel configuration guards.
If that does not lead to any warning, I'm fine. However this kind of
change is better received subsystem-wide than platform-wide, if you ever
wish to go this route.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240716180010.126987-1-rgallaispou@gmail.com
This link however seems irrelevant.
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists