lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2c94aa3-c557-4a74-82fc-d88821522a8f@shopee.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:43:18 +0800
From: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Question] ixgbe:Mechanism of RSS



On 2025/1/2 16:13, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 4:53 AM Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi masters,
>>
>>         We use the Intel Corporation 82599ES NIC in our production environment. And it has 63 rx queues, every rx queue interrupt is processed by a single cpu.
>>         The RSS configuration can be seen as follow:
>>
>>         RX flow hash indirection table for eno5 with 63 RX ring(s):
>>         0:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         8:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         16:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         24:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         32:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         40:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         48:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         56:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         64:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         72:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         80:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         88:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         96:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         104:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>         112:      0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7
>>         120:      8     9    10    11    12    13    14    15
>>
>>         The maximum number of RSS queues is 16. So I have some questions about this. Will other cpus except 0~15 receive the rx interrupts?
>>
>>         In our production environment, cpu 16~62 also receive the rx interrupts. Was our RSS misconfigured?
> 
> It really depends on which cpus are assigned to each IRQ.
> 

Hi Eric,

Each irq was assigned to a single cpu, for exapmle:

irq	cpu

117      0
118      1

......

179      62

All cpus trigger interrupts not only cpus 0~15. 
It seems that the result is inconsistent with the RSS hash value.


Thanks!

> Look at /proc/irq/{IRQ_NUM}/smp_affinity
> 
> Also you can have some details in Documentation/networking/scaling.rst


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ