[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z3ZUFq7dyiRHrdmi@fedora>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:53:42 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <tavip@...gle.com>
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+3c47b5843403a45aef57@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: prevent adding a device which is already
a team device lower
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 08:50:42AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:56:47PM -0800, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > Prevent adding a device which is already a team device lower,
> > e.g. adding veth0 if vlan1 was already added and veth0 is a lower of
> > vlan1.
> >
> > This is not useful in practice and can lead to recursive locking:
> >
> > $ ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> > $ ip link set veth0 up
> > $ ip link set veth1 up
> > $ ip link add link veth0 name veth0.1 type vlan protocol 802.1Q id 1
> > $ ip link add team0 type team
> > $ ip link set veth0.1 down
> > $ ip link set veth0.1 master team0
> > team0: Port device veth0.1 added
> > $ ip link set veth0 down
> > $ ip link set veth0 master team0
> >
I didn't test, what if enslave veth0 first and then add enslave veth0.1 later.
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists