netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] i40e deadcoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250104081636.67a10134@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 08:16:36 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com
Cc: linux@...blig.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] i40e deadcoding

On Thu,  2 Jan 2025 17:37:08 +0000 linux@...blig.org wrote:
>   This is a bunch of deadcoding of functions that
> are entirely uncalled in the i40e driver.
> 
>   Build tested only.

Intel folks, is it okay if we take this (and the igc series) 
in directly? Seems very unlikely to require testing...