[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <837e39b7-0e95-4f6d-b2cb-8dbefa9eb696@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 16:45:22 +0200
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>, Bar Shapira <bshapira@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Dragos Tatulea
<dtatulea@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: use do_aux_work for PHC overflow
checks
On 04/01/2025 0:25, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> On 22/12/2024 14:10, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
>> On Tue Dec 17, 2024 at 8:57 PM CET, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>>> The overflow_work is using system wq to do overflow checks and updates
>>> for PHC device timecounter, which might be overhelmed by other tasks.
>>> But there is dedicated kthread in PTP subsystem designed for such
>>> things. This patch changes the work queue to proper align with PTP
>>> subsystem and to avoid overloading system work queue.
>>> The adjfine() function acts the same way as overflow check worker,
>>> we can postpone ptp aux worker till the next overflow period after
>>> adjfine() was called.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c | 25 +++++++++++--------
>>> include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 1 -
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c b/
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c
>>> index 4822d01123b4..ff3780331273 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/clock.c
>>> @@ -322,17 +322,16 @@ static void mlx5_pps_out(struct work_struct *work)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> -static void mlx5_timestamp_overflow(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +static long mlx5_timestamp_overflow(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp_info)
>>> {
>>> - struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
>>> struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev;
>>> struct mlx5_timer *timer;
>>> struct mlx5_clock *clock;
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>> - timer = container_of(dwork, struct mlx5_timer, overflow_work);
>>> - clock = container_of(timer, struct mlx5_clock, timer);
>>> + clock = container_of(ptp_info, struct mlx5_clock, ptp_info);
>>> mdev = container_of(clock, struct mlx5_core_dev, clock);
>>> + timer = &clock->timer;
>>> if (mdev->state == MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR)
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -343,7 +342,7 @@ static void mlx5_timestamp_overflow(struct
>>> work_struct *work)
>>> write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&clock->lock, flags);
>>> out:
>>> - schedule_delayed_work(&timer->overflow_work, timer-
>>> >overflow_period);
>>> + return timer->overflow_period;
>>> }
>>> static int mlx5_ptp_settime_real_time(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
>>> @@ -517,6 +516,7 @@ static int mlx5_ptp_adjfine(struct ptp_clock_info
>>> *ptp, long scaled_ppm)
>>> timer->cycles.mult = mult;
>>> mlx5_update_clock_info_page(mdev);
>>> write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&clock->lock, flags);
>>> + ptp_schedule_worker(clock->ptp, timer->overflow_period);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ static const struct ptp_clock_info
>>> mlx5_ptp_clock_info = {
>>> .settime64 = mlx5_ptp_settime,
>>> .enable = NULL,
>>> .verify = NULL,
>>> + .do_aux_work = mlx5_timestamp_overflow,
>>> };
>>> static int mlx5_query_mtpps_pin_mode(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u8
>>> pin,
>>> @@ -1052,12 +1053,12 @@ static void mlx5_init_overflow_period(struct
>>> mlx5_clock *clock)
>>> do_div(ns, NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
>>> timer->overflow_period = ns;
>>> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&timer->overflow_work, mlx5_timestamp_overflow);
>>> - if (timer->overflow_period)
>>> - schedule_delayed_work(&timer->overflow_work, 0);
>>> - else
>>> + if (!timer->overflow_period) {
>>> + timer->overflow_period = HZ;
>>> mlx5_core_warn(mdev,
>>> - "invalid overflow period, overflow_work is not
>>> scheduled\n");
>>> + "invalid overflow period,"
>>> + "overflow_work is scheduled once per second\n");
>>> + }
>>> if (clock_info)
>>> clock_info->overflow_period = timer->overflow_period;
>>> @@ -1172,6 +1173,9 @@ void mlx5_init_clock(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
>>> MLX5_NB_INIT(&clock->pps_nb, mlx5_pps_event, PPS_EVENT);
>>> mlx5_eq_notifier_register(mdev, &clock->pps_nb);
>>> +
>>> + if (clock->ptp)
>>> + ptp_schedule_worker(clock->ptp, 0);
>>> }
>>> void mlx5_cleanup_clock(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
>>> @@ -1188,7 +1192,6 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_clock(struct mlx5_core_dev
>>> *mdev)
>>> }
>>> cancel_work_sync(&clock->pps_info.out_work);
>>> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&clock->timer.overflow_work);
>>> if (mdev->clock_info) {
>>> free_page((unsigned long)mdev->clock_info);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
>>> index fc7e6153b73d..3ac2fc1b52cf 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
>>> @@ -690,7 +690,6 @@ struct mlx5_timer {
>>> struct timecounter tc;
>>> u32 nominal_c_mult;
>>> unsigned long overflow_period;
>>> - struct delayed_work overflow_work;
>>> };
>>> struct mlx5_clock {
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
>>
>
> Hi Saeed, Tariq, Leon!
>
> We need explicit Ack-by from official mlx5 maintainer here to let this
> patch go directly to net-next. Could you please check it?
>
> Thanks,
> Vadim
>
>
Hi,
Back after a long vacation.
I'll reply shortly.
Regards,
Tariq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists