[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ppss971-6406-82q4-3371-1q8n9299qrq1@vanv.qr>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 16:27:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <ej@...i.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
cc: egyszeregy@...email.hu, fw@...len.de, pablo@...filter.org,
lorenzo@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, leitao@...ian.org,
amiculas@...co.com, kadlec@...filter.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] netfilter: x_tables: Merge xt_*.c files which
has same name.
On Monday 2025-01-06 15:22, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> x86_64-before:
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 716 432 0 1148 47c xt_dscp.o
>> 1142 432 0 1574 626 xt_DSCP.o
>> 593 224 0 817 331 xt_hl.o
>> 934 224 0 1158 486 xt_HL.o
>> 1099 120 0 1219 4c3 xt_rateest.o
>> 2126 365 4 2495 9bf xt_RATEEST.o
>> 747 224 0 971 3cb xt_tcpmss.o
>> 2824 352 0 3176 c68 xt_TCPMSS.o
>> total data: 2373
>>
>> x86_64-after:
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 1709 848 0 2557 9fd xt_dscp.o
>> 1352 448 0 1800 708 xt_hl.o
>> 3075 481 4 3560 de8 xt_rateest.o
>> 3423 576 0 3999 f9f xt_tcpmss.o
>> total data: 2353
>
>So you have saved 20 bytes in the data segment. A 0.8% reduction. If i
>was developing this patchset, when i see this number, i would
>immediately think, why am i bothering?
Before:
$ lsmod
xt_TCPMSS 12288 0
xt_tcpmss 12288 0
After:
$ lsmod
xt_tcpmss 12288 0
which is a 50% reduction in run-time memory use.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists